« Davos Dispatches: Brin defends Google's China move | Main | More Gloom-and-Doom For Newspapers »

January 26, 2006

Umair Haque on Getting Stupider

Umair Haque is worried that a steady diet of tech.memeorandum is making him stupid:

[from The Problems with 2.0, pt 34514]

I luv Memeorandum and all it's reconstructor cousins. It's one of the first things of my reading list. It's hugely slashed my search costs in finding new stuff.But there's a problem. Ever since I've started using it to the point where it replaces many of my other sources, I have gotten stupider.I can feel it - I don't think as fast, flexibly, or freely.

I persist in spending at least half of my reading time wandering around, for that very reason.

Aggregation a la tech.memeorandum is great for finding out what people are piling on, but bad for finding new, oddball, errant nonsense... and we need a reasonable admixture of that goo or we get stale, cobwebby, stupid.

The same reason that you have to get out of the RSS reader: too much same old, same old.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c50ba53ef00d8345946b769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Umair Haque on Getting Stupider:

» Tyranny of the Majority from Minor Point
Stowe Boyd comments on a post by Umair Haque saying "Aggregation a la tech.memeorandum is great for finding out what people are piling on, but bad for finding new, oddball, errant nonsense..." True. The long-tail is increasingly difficult t... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

>The same reason that you have to get out of the RSS reader: too much same old, same old.

Stowe, spot on. More thoughts on that here, via "newvoices"...

http://www.socialcustomer.com/2005/07/the_newvoices_t.html

Heh. My 'interesting stuff' engine chuquet.com is *meant* to show you what everyone is piling into right now, but I've got to admit that oddball errant nonsense nevertheless appears. Near the top, too.

Weird, because I didn't intend for it to do that.

Now you've said it, though, I can see how it'd be useful to have leftfield stuff appearing in the midst of the 'normal' stuff. If I ever work out why the chuquet.com algorithms are doing what they do, I'll try to make sure that they just keep on doing what they do. If you know what I mean.

Completely agree. After being a Bloglines addict, at the end of last year I started accessing it once a week. I wanted to read the posts by actually visiting my favorite blogs and see if I find random nuggets of information. With the aggregators, such as Memeorandum, I just glance through them for similar reasons, and it seems a lot of people are just posting to be recognized on these types of sites. 2006 is staying old school blog reading for me :)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.