« Campfire: The Beta Is Coming | Main | Gmail Chat: A Step Toward Nerdvana »

February 06, 2006

The Gatekeepers, Redux

Don Dodge -- who is on a tear recently -- posts about The new way to launch your product or company:

It doesn't cost anything to publicize your new product or service. Simply engage a couple of the "A-List" bloggers (Michael Arrington, Robert Scoble, Dave Winer, Om Malik, Steve Gillmor, Cory Doctorow, Richard MacManus,� Stowe Boyd, and others) by sending them a link to your new product or service. Tell them what problem it solves and why it is cool. When they blog, people listen. When their stories hit Tech Memeorandum, Digg, TailRank, and other services the story explodes across thousands of blogs within hours.

Nice group to be included in.

In effect Don is suggesting that these uber-bloggers are becoming gatekeepers, and as they discover something neat, or innovative, or fun, and then blog it, gazillions of others follow.

The power law at work again.

And of course companies are not blind to this. That's why I am getting five or more emails/calls from companies in the process of launching new products, every week.

And I am certain that PR firms all over are honing their "blogger relations" skills, as these uber-bloggers begin to fill the role that "analysts" from Gartner, Forrester, and other analyst firms used to fill, and to some extent still do. Except now it's specific analysts who have proven their mettle, and not just because of the Gartner brand.

As I wrote a few weeks ago ...

[from Who Are The New Gatekeepers?]

It's a dynamic system, where individual authority -- good writing on a topic -- leads to emergent authority (as many swarm to read a great post), which allows Technorati to mine those readers' links, which leads to increased individual authority, and so on. Meanwhile, individuals combine into groups -- like the Web 2.0 Workgroup -- which confers an almost institutional authority, or are included on exclusive lists in aggregation, like the tech.memeorandum 2000 bloggers.

So, the answer is: there is no gate. There are many waypoints, many street signs, and many ways to go, but no one is barring the gate, or deciding who is let in. This is confusing if we try to apply the old map to the new territory, but not if we try to perceive the new media universe as it is.

But even though things are fluid, and constantly changing, and even though there are a million niches out there, companies will try to simplify the system for their advantage. When they are getting ready to launch new products, the entrepreneurs want there to be gatekeepers, so they can talk to 20 or 30 people instead of millions.

So uber-bloggers are filling an economic and social need, based on the trust and authority that they have developed, and acting as a filter for others. And the entrepreneurs, on one side, and the greater reading blogosphere, on the other, are keeping the lens focused on a short list of a few hundred tech bloggers, whose influence is spiking.

The odd things is how the prior arbiters of tech viability have fallen, and how little they have done in the blogosphere. You expect that Gartner, Forrester and so on would have created hundreds of successful, influential bloggers, rather than just a handful. It could be that the writing and analytic styles of the two worlds don't jibe, but that seems wrong to me. Perhaps the pay-for-advice model of the analyst firms, or their use of the imperial "we" in their analysis, just don't make the transition to the blogosphere very well.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c50ba53ef00d83423fc2d53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Gatekeepers, Redux:

» Steve Boyd on RSS "breaking through" from Web 2.0 Technologies
Cogent thoughts by Steve Boyd, based on an earlier post by Dave Winer. On the centralization vs. decentralization aspect, I'm with Steve (decentralization). It's the social aspect of finding others who share our interests, and discovering new content i... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Unfortunately many of these new breed of experts/analyists are nothing more then paid consultants looking for work.

When it comes to general tech coverage these A-list bloggers will get out your news but at the same time pass on your info to their vc fund friends and create a lot of better funded competitors for you over night.

In the more niche markets these bloggers are in fact nothing but paid consultants looking for work or fronts to push an agenda. Online gambling is super bad, some companies are secretly and no so secretly employing 40 to 50 bloggers to talk about nothing but gambling. I think the only real questions going forward is how much is it going to cost for a blogger to push your agenda within your niche?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.