« 30 Boxes Turns One! | Main | Outside.in Getting Out? »

February 28, 2007

Charles River's QuickStart Getting Off To A Slow Start

Paul Kedrotsky quietly disembowels the Quickstart program:

[from Paul Kedrosky's Infectious Greed: Stats on Charles River's QuickStart Program]

Charles River started a much-ballyhooed $250,000 venture loan program late last year, and here are the first stats for it:

  • Number of applicants: 1,400
  • Number of funded companies: 6

Interestingly, at least for a smaller and supposedly more democratic program, those are very long odds, worse than the likelihood of getting a traditional venture investment from most venture firms.

If you use the same VC mindset for people who are looking for tiny money as those who are looking for large, then this is exactly what will happen.

Makes me want to start a microinvestment program for early stage software startups. Rather than playing in the equity world, imagine the following scenario for a hypothetical SoftLoan.org non-profit:

  1. Proposals for small (<$100,000) investments for software startups would be called for, which would be posted at a site. Deals would be structured as microloans, convertible to equity.
  2. The non-profit would provide an estimate of valuation, vet the entrepreneurs, and weed out the dumb stuff.
  3. Potential investors would decide, individually, or as consortia, whether to provide all or some of the desired debt financing, presumably after vetting the deal and the team in detail.
  4. The non-profit would take a small slice of every deal to support its operations.

I should pitch this to Omidyar Network I think.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c50ba53ef00d8351d502a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Charles River's QuickStart Getting Off To A Slow Start:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

One thing I would suggest would be that softloan (or whatever it gets called) standardises the terms and they are non-negotiable for both sides. It wouldn't fit for everyone, but it would allow you to actually get a decent amount of deals done. With such low $ numbers, you could probably get away with it.

A big problem with Angel and other syndicates is that they can never f$%#ing agree on this or that term.

I wish you would. Good financing options for small amounts is what is needed... badly.

I like it :)

Jevon - That's a good idea, and along the lines of what I was thinking.

Henrik - Yes.

Chris - Thanks!

I wish you would

Is there any update on this ? How can new startups apply for this loan? Please provide more info if you can

Thansk

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.