Spinfluencer: On the Record...Online with Social Media Maverick Stowe Boyd
So now I am a "social media maverick"... Hmmm. Maybe that's pretty close. But the show notes make me sound like a prick. Maybe Spininfluencer's Eric Schwartzman doesn't like me much.
[from Spinfluencer: On the Record...Online with Social Media Maverick Stowe Boyd]SHOW NOTES:
04:40 - Boyd sounds off on the new ethics of the blogoshere and how he ruffled feathers of blogging giant Shel Holtz.
[stowe: 'sounds off'? Hmmm. I thought I was just answering a question.]
07:10 - Will PR professionals relinquish control and join the conversation?
09:22 - Boyd on the nature of consensual blogs.
15:27 - Boyd opines on the most effective use of social media and it’s [sic -- why can't writers get this right. "it's" is the contraction for "it is" and "its" is the possessive.] relation to the broadcast model.
16:47 - Boyd slams the social media press release as an antiquated notion, a holdover from the days of the telegraph and offers ways in which to enter the 21st century.
[stowe: Slams?]
19:58 - Schwartzman and Boyd debate the validity of the press release as a means to distribute information. Boyd ridicules companies who ignore technological trends.
25:56 - Thinking outside the box: new tactics for a new era of media.
28:30 - What are the key ways in which companies can abide by the ethics of new media?
30:26 - Boyd discusses the nature of authority vs. integrity in both traditional media and in the blogosphere.
33:33 - Facing a moral dilemma: how PR professionals should behave in the blogosphere when their livelihood depends on the promotion of a person or product.
36:40 - Boyd on why he is legitimate and relevant.
[stowe: as an example of how blogging legitimacy is gained.]
37:07 - Plugging the Boyd's upcoming keynote speech at the 2007 PR Online Convergence Confererence titled "Bloggers and PR: Why Can’t We Just Get Along."
[stowe: "the Boyd's upcoming keynote"? I don't think I deserve a definite article.]
38:31 - End.
I expect the same sort of pushback at the PR Online Convergence conference, where I am keynoting. There seem to be so few PR folks that get it. An interview with Brian Solis of PR 2.0 would be so different, and so much better, I think. I am going to have Brian on /Talkshow soon, and we'll see.

>"the Boyd"
heh. the whole definite article thing always cracks me up. although i suppose danah b. could use this, too. (of course, d's being "the boyd," lowercase.)
then again, flipping someone "the Boyd" could take on a whole new meaning. :-)
Posted by: christopher carfi | April 24, 2007 at 07:21 AM
So much of what you object to in PR is sloppy, puffy writing... and I couldn't agree more. A simple first step in cleaning up PR -- for social or traditional media -- is to ban adverbs and most silly-sounding substitutions for the word "says". Who, in real life, says "opines"?
Posted by: Lynda Radosevich | April 24, 2007 at 07:35 AM
I think Schwartzman uses the phrase "sounds off" often, but I might just be making that up.
I haven't listened to the podcast yet, but I will. But I wonder if Eric is confused when he says you (Stowe) slam the social media release as "antiquated"? Is that accurate? Even if you don't think it's a good tool, how is the social media release antiquated?
I don't think you sound like a prick. You sound like a guy I'd love to have a few beers with. And Eric seems like a guy who rushes through his show notes with some maybe misleading generalizations. Still, when he has good guests, his podcast is interesting.
I look forward to whatever comes of any interaction between you and Solis.
Posted by: Mike Keliher | April 25, 2007 at 02:13 PM
Actually, you seem like an interesting guy who's not afraid to rock the boat. I don't write the show notes myself, but the person who wrote these said they really enjoyed listening to what you had to say, so I think you might be reading into something that's not there.
Posted by: Eric Schwartzman | April 25, 2007 at 05:01 PM