« Virtual Worlds In The Enterprise | Main | The Gravitational Pull Of Enterprise 2.0 »

July 09, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c50ba53ef00e553ad45508834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Twitter Spam: What Can We Do?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Like the concept. Twitter could do something without us really though, if a certain percentage (50, 40?) of users followed by a twitterer blocked them then twitter could suspend the account?

Agree wholeheartedly, but honestly the easiest and most point-a-to-point-b solution is for Twitter to add a "block damned spammer" link next to the normal "block". That way they get all the info they need to do something about it and do not have to rely solely on metrics and programs to figure out who the spammers are.

I mean, we could create a scriptlet that adds such a link and submits to an app that stores and manages the list of spammers a'la spamhaus project, but then what do we do with the data? Forward it to @ev?

Better for them to provide us with a manner of specifically identifying spammers to them, and let them manage the deactivations.

One of the challenges of reporting spam as you have described it is that the spam reports are very public and there will always be people who are in a gray area - i.e. not clearly a spammer but pushing the envelope - who will get very upset that they are being called out as a spammer. Then all of the energy gets directed towards explaining why they were identified as a spammer, debating the algorithm that was used to classify them as a spammer, etc. I'd rather see a simple 'This is a spammer' checkbox added to the Block button. This would allow people to quietly report a spammer and block them in two clicks. I'd also like to see Twitter add a 'report spammer' function to their API. Many of the utilities that have been built around Twitter filter out a lot of spam. Wouldn't it be great if these 3rd party app's could take the results of that filtering and send a message back to Twitter with the ID's of the spammers?

I've been saying for ages that Twitter should instigate a 10:1 maximum following to followers ratio - if you want to follow 1000 people, you got to get at least 100 to follow you. If that doesn't stop them, try 5:1 :)

At least it would mean that nobody would suddenly appear on twitter following 40,000 people and jamming up the server just to improve their SEO.

Steve

@jon & @steve: I found out plenty about what Twitter's doing about it on the Stop Twitter Spam blog. They've instituted limits, which will definitely slow spammers down. And they seem to be shutting them down pretty quickly too, based on their retweeting habits. My idea is to just help them do it quicker if possible.

@STS: yep, great idea. I'd make it an extra link, "@name is a spammer" and then you get 'em blocked and Twitter notified in just one click. And you're right of course: twittering about spammers could lead to witch hunts. But if we work out some sort of limit - @twitspammers forwards a name only after receiving it at least 10 or 20 or however many times - that should keep the "I'm annoyed with you" revenge finger-pointing to a minimum I reckon.

Another idea: @twitspammers tweets followers only "New spammers posted" with a link, and posts names directly to a blog with a "block" link next to every posted name, as on the TwitSpam blog. Not for the first time I wish I was a kick-ass coder and could hack this together myself. Any takers?


i think machines are doing it, or are involved ... many of the names such as rita1962 lead to the same site

easier to ignore spammers on twitter than email prior to gmail

the amazing thing, someone can feel pride, coming home to his/her family ... hi honey, it was a great day, i spammed 20,000 people today. right up there with master of the misspelled link site squatters.

it is really just another example of people's fear of lack

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

About

/Message Search

Publish2 Stream

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    /ambivalence

    Colophon