I have only fooled with Twitter's list a bit, but I am starting to get an insight to how they could allow me to fine tune the early warning system and social hot tub that Twitter principally is for me.
Yes, I have created a handful of lists, but mostly they have only a cursory few names in them. But then, I realized that there is a subset of Twitter accounts that make sense to relegate to big static contextual buckets, and to unfollow them. I am doing that with non-individuals, like software companies, airlines, news outlets, and food wagons. Why does this make sense?
- My interest in what they are putting in front of me is highly variable. When I am in NYC and hungry, I am interested in NYC food trucks. Otherwise, I am not.
- Some of these accounts generate a gazillion posts a day: they seem to lack discernment about what is truly important, and of course there is no personalization in Twitter, per se (more about that later).
- A bunch of what comes through from many of these accounts is retweets of other people saying nice things about them. I am happy that @anairline has made someone happy, but actually I am more interested in when people I know are happy, or sad, rather than @anairline blowing its own horn.
Immediately after I put @mashable into a new list called @stoweboyd/tech-news and unfollowed, a friend of mine pulled something out of the @mashable stream and tossed it over the list-based filter I had created. @sarahkennon acted as what I am now calling a fonter: she 'filtered the post on' to me.
So I now expect that I will diminish the number of accounts I am following, perhaps by as much as one quarter or one third. These will be relegated to lists, which I will open and look at contextually. I will catch up on all the airlines news at once, once in a while, or when I am thinking about travel.
Note that some big news breaking at @jetblue will still reach me in moments, because other people will see some breaking news about @jetblue and fonter it to me. This is the personalization of the twittersphere: the socialization of news through personal connections, personal relationships.
The good fonterers make the best Twitter friends. I will always depend upon the kindess of fonterers.
I would also like to see dynamic agents: on-the-fly lists created by algorithm based on those tweeting about a breaking meme or hashtag. For the moment, we will have to do with static lists as filters, and dynamic agents, real people, as fonters.
Oh no another new word- Fonters.. I am all about filtering everything using all types of filters- Shared Google Reader cut my blogs by a ton and I feel like I haven't missed anything. Ran them thru Yahoo Pipes too. My groups in Tweetdeck was worked on constantly. Now doing same with Twitter. Use Lazyfeed so I am not in a bubble of thought of my own making- have to find ways to inject up and comers etc...Thanks for another word and now where is the rating system for the best fonter's in the land?
Posted by: twitter.com/smallbiztwit | November 06, 2009 at 05:40 PM
If you are working with a network marketing co., start up a twitter account using your personal name. By doing so, you are branding you. If you have your own business, than I recommend starting an account with your business name.
Posted by: Rachale Kelley | November 07, 2009 at 03:32 AM
Interesting perspective that 'unimportant' twitter handles can be relegated to 'lists' so that we can have a look at them on a 'need' basis and don't have to follow them regularly if we don't want to.
Sanjay Uvach
India Politics
Posted by: Sanjay Uvach | November 07, 2009 at 06:33 AM
Remember aglets Stowe? Now might be a good time. If you're at Defrag, would love to meet you.
- Lief
http://lieflarson.businesscard2.com
Posted by: Lief Larson | November 09, 2009 at 08:13 PM