Stowe Boyd, Editor

Search
« In-Depth Look Inside the Twitter World | Main | Typepad 2.0: Ready For The Next Phase »
Wednesday
08Jul2009

A New Take On Operating Systems: Responding to Chrome OS

Everyone is all spun up to the point of having their heads explode about Chrome OS.

This is being cast in a very obvious way: an attack on Microsoft whose future remains tightly linked to Windows.

But what is happening here is the first foray into a new generation of user experience, and unltimately, a new paradigm for the Web, more than for the desktop.

Way back in October 2007, Jasons Calacanis tried to brand something Web 3.0, and I responded with this:

[via /Message: Jason Calacanis on Web 3.0]

Personally, I feel the vague lineaments of something beyond Web 2.0, and they involve some fairly radical steps. Imagine a Web without browsers. Imagine breaking completely away from the document metaphor, or a true blurring of application and information. That's what Web 3.0 will be, but I bet we will call it something else.

Paradoxically, Google (or whoever) building a new operating system for edge devices (all our PCs, laptops, netbooks, handhelds, cell phones) that is predicated on the Web existing as the primary model of interaction and information access and storage will spell the end of the browser as we know it.

Think how odd it is to have a bazillion apps that we run on our desktops, but a single porthole to the web? A porthole that has to do a mazillion things?

If we rethink the operating environment for edge devices under the assumption that they will (nearly) always be connected to the Web, then a single swiss army knife tool to access everything online is a dumb approach. Instead, build browserish capabilities into the OS so that developers are free to construct all sorts of different and specialized apps, relying on common services for caching, messaging, and so on.

Yes, Microsft will be the ox first gored by this, but so will Apple -- whose OS is still stuck in the 90's, although much much better than Windows, lord knows -- as well as Linux and all the old school phone OS's.

It will all rapidly shift into a very different world. We will all be reformatting our hard drives in the near future, and never looking back.

Reader Comments (6)

Its groundbreaking idea from Google web OS and they are planning to wipe out Windows in a most strategic manner. Google clearly pointing to Microsoft when they say "The operating systems that browsers run were designed in an era where there was no web". But there are few questions which are unanswered like what will happen when we will go offline in Chrome OS? Can we use offline applications like iTunes or Photoshop? Can we run third party applications? How they are going to make profit from it ? I am also bit concerned whether Chrome OS will be embraced by enterprises as it is open source and web based as there is always a security issue....Just wait another thought can Chrome OS will become a global hit especially in small countries where internet is very fickle. But leaving these things aside its going to be win-win situation for the users and it will be interesting to witness the war between giants.
July 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKrishna Santani
I don't know that Microsoft and Apple will be gored by a shift in thought. They have some pretty smart people at those places, and I think they will adapt or leave and adapt elsewhere.

I think we have to stop calling these things operating systems. There is a definition of what an operating system is, and I don't think these new ideas fit that old definition. Call the new ideas by old names confuses me to no end. I don't know what to call the new ideas, but I trust that the people creating the idea can also create a new name.
July 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDwayne Phillips
Yes, excellent. The OS environment needs to reflectour new behaviors - small time online to most time online. Unfortunately I'm not sure Chrome is the best model for this - I've been using it on and off for months now - can't decide if old habits die hard or if I prefer FF for other reasons, but I'd choose FF over Chrome.
July 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJoe Duck
It doesn't have to be a small country for the internet to be fickle. I'm in Australia and I can't even get PHONE for most of my rail commute trip to work. Over an hour in a virtual black hole. If I couldn't do anything without a connection, I'd be pretty well stuffed.

I only got access to broadband a few years back - there's places here that still can't get it, and that's on top of the areas that can't get phone coverage at all.

I love that google keeps innovating, but the state of tech in the US is not the same as the state of tech the rest of the world lives with. It'd be nice to be considered sometimes, so as not to feel ten steps behind all the time...
July 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterCrystalsQuest
Hi Stowe. Have you looked at the Google Chrome Extension work?
July 15, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterEdwin Khodabakchian
Edwin - Not yet.
July 16, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterStowe Boyd

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>