Twitter Shakes Things Up Again: Fred Wilson, Bijan Sabet Leaving Board - Peter Kafka - Social - AllThingsD
More turnover as Costolo marches out more of the old guard at Twitter, turning early stage investors out, after making room for seasoned entrepreneurs like David Rosenblatt and Mike McCue last year.
via Twitter
Wilson: Don’t be a Facebook bitch, a Google bitch, or a Twitter bitch: be your own bitch. #disrupt
Rob is an accidental businessperson. He’s actually a pretty good businessperson, but he thinks of himself as an artist.
If you are building a marketplace or a social platform, make sure to build curation into your model. It will make the service easier for everyone to navigate, particularly new users.
NYC Catching UP With SV In Seed Funding
Om pulls some interesting data out of CB Insights regarding seen funding of internet startups:
Om Malik, By The Numbers: Seed Funding is The New Black
Here is some salient data from CB Insights’ latest report covering the July-September time frame:
- Nearly $1.253 billion was invested in 233 Internet related deals. Series A media deal size was at an all time high of $3.4 million, once again proving that early stage investing is going through a frothy phase.
- San Francisco saw 36 Internet deals that brought in $131 million, while New York City saw 31 Internet deals garner $126 million. In comparison, Mountain View, San Mateo & Palo Alto saw 21 deals focused on the Internet and they brought in a total of $174 million.
- Early stage investing is dominating the New York area and accounted for nearly 63 percent of all deals. New York can thank folks like Chris Dixon and Fred Wilson for bringing investment dollars to area startups.
NYC is exploding, as I said in this piece last spring:
New York City’s tech scene is expanding at an astonishing rate these days, which raises the obvious question: why now? And, if New York has all the right ingredients to create a rich and deep technology culture, why didn’t it appear earlier?
My theory is that New York lacked, until recently, a critical factor: smart early stage investors.
The other parts of the puzzle were in place: great schools, brainy entrepreneurs, and abundant media and PR people. But without the manure that VCs provide, what looked to be a great greenhouse was cold, and very little would grow.
It is manure that makes greenhouses hot, that makes them hotbeds, and the critical factor is now being provided by folks like Chris Dixon, Fred Wilson, and John Borthwick. Chris Dixon recently made the case that the financial services downturn has dumped a lot of smart people out of financial sector, and also chimes in on the role that smart investors are having:
[…] why did New York City lag behind the West Coast this decade so much more than last decade? Especially since the internet in the 2000’s has been more than ever about consumers, media, and advertising – traditional New York City strengths?I think the only explanation is that the finance bubble of 2003-2008 was a giant talent suck on the East Coast. The people I knew graduating out of top engineering or business programs on the East Cast were all trying to work at hedge funds or big banks or else felt like fish out of water and moved west. Money was flowing so freely in the finance world that there was no way the risk/reward trade off of startups could compete. Eventually it just became downright idiosyncratic to be a startup person on the East Coast. The Larry and Sergey of the East Coast were probably inventing high frequency trading algorithms at Goldman Sachs.
But this is why New York City now seems poised for a technology startup boom. The finance bubble has burst and the industry will hopefully return to its historical norm, about half its bubble size. The traditional advertising and media businesses are in disarray. The people who work in them will no doubt find new applications for their talents.
There is also a nice ecosystem developing in New York City. Union Square Ventures is one of the best VC’s in the country, with early stage investments in companies like Twitter and Etsy (that were followed on by top West Coast VCs at significant markups). Bessemer is an old firm that has a managed to stay relevant with investments in Yelp, Skype, and LinkedIn among others. There is also a new wave of scrappy Boston firms spending a lot of time in New York City – specifically Spark, General Catalyst, Flybridge, and Bain Ventures. First Round Capital out of Philadelphia is extremely active in early stage investing in New York. There are a bunch of veteran entrepreneurs actively investing in and mentoring seed stage startups. Google has a big office here and many people seem to be leaving to go start companies.
Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures, recently made the point that NYC has been slowly growing as a start-up hub for a decade:
Chris [Dixon] argues that for the past decade, hedge funds and wall street have been a huge talent suck here in NYC and now that they are scaling back, our kinds of companies will find it easier to attract the best and brightest. I agree completely.But I take some offense to Chris’ view that NYC was “irrelevant” in the 2003-2008 internet boom. TACODA, Right Media, Gawker, Quigo, Delicious, Etsy, Meetup, Indeed, Tumblr, Return Path, etc, etc. I don’t call that irrelevant. I call it misunderstood. Good thing people, including our Mayor, are waking up to what a good thing we’ve got going here.
I think a tipping point has been reached, though, where all the pieces are now connecting, and we are moving past an inflection point into explosive growth.
And the result will be a richer, growing, and more dominant tech scene in NYC.
- Fred Wilson Says New Data Shows New York is More Efficient Than Silicon Valley (observer.com)
- Overall Investment Dollars Down, Says Quarterly Report, But Seed Deals Strong (readwriteweb.com)
- Why New York Will Challenge The Valley for Consumer Internet Supremacy (businessinsider.com)
Surprise! Twitter Ecosystem Attracting Less Investment
For a piece coming from an analyst firm with the work ‘insight’ in its name, you’d expect a bit more insight offered and not just numbers.
CB Insights has determined that ‘pure play’ twitter start-ups are getting less funding than formerly:
As Twitter’s popularity has grown with users, we wondered if this popularity translated into more investment by venture capitalists and angel investors into pure play Twitter startups? CB Insights’ venture capital and angel investor data suggests that venture capitalists and angels may be a bit less sanguine about the Twitter ecosystem than they were last year. This is the opposite of what we saw in an earlier analysis for another hot ecosystem – Apple’s iPad and iPhone ecosystem – which saw a 220% increase in funding vs. last year.
First, the bad news…Last year (from June 2008 to May 2009), we’d seen $21.6M fly from venture capitalists and angel investors to pure-play Twitter startups. In the June 2009 to May 2010 timeframe, the investment funding dropped over 50% to $10.4M.
Now, the good news…The number of investment rounds held nearly flat with 11 rounds in our analysis of last year vs. 10 rounds in the more recent timeframe. This does, however, show that average amounts invested by investors has dipped fairly dramatically going from nearly a $2M average round last year to just over $1 million more recently. We also saw a high degree of collaboration between angel investors and venture capital firms on these deals and that these pure-play funded Twitter startups were going to a diverse array of industries.
There are lots of theories on why the amount invested has dipped with the most popular explanation being a feeling of uncertainty by application developers and investors alike about the direction Twitter will go. More recently, compounding the uncertainty are acquisitions by Twitter of the likes of Tweetie and Summize (filling holes on its platform)? Time will tell if these moves will drive investors to be even more cautious about the platform?
Oh, damn: not ‘time will tell’; not that lame line.
The post links to Fred Wilson’s incediary Twitter Inflection Point post of last April, in which Wilson (an investor and board member of Twitter) throws down the gauntlet, and basically warns the Twitter ecosystem that Twitter will be filling the self-created ‘holes’ in the product, and many niches in the Twitter ecology will no longer be viable for third-party vendors.The following week was the Twitter Chirp conference, where Ev Williams announced the acquisition of Tweetie to be the Twitter client on iPhone, as well as a Twitter developed Blackbird client.
So, there is ‘no time will tell’ involved. Here’s what I wrote after Wilson’s comments and before Chirp:
Twitter Raising The Infrastructure: App Builders Better Run For The Ultrastructure
Here’s what is happening: Twitter is consolidating its position at the center of the ecosystem it has engendered, and as part of that functionality that is deemed necessary to the infrastructure is going to be built by them, or at least owned by them through acquisition.
The old model had a lot of holes, like search, clients, Url shortening, pictures, and geolocation. These niches had many players trying to establish themselves, creating a rich ultrastructure above the platform:
Twitter started to buy some companies to fill glaring holes (like Summize for search) and they have built some parts of other capabilities (like their own URL shortener for direct messages), but mostly the maps was still a mess.
Now, they have bought Tweetie, built a client for Blackberry, and they are moving toward a new theory of where the platform begins and ends:
Of course there is no saying that Twitter will leave the line there. They are going to have to make their roadmap clear at the upcoming Chirp developer conference, so that third parties can make reasonable investments in new applications without the fear that Twitter will step on their toes.
However, I am making a bet. I am sure that Twitter realizes the value of analytics: the treasure of information about the flow in Twitter can’t be treated as a side show, because it is the show. Therefore, I am predicting that Twitter will build or buy technology to capture all sorts of information — what links are streaming by, who’s using what hashtags, and sentiment about brands — this is enormously valuable. Acquisition of companies like Radian6, bit.ly and a few others would make sense, especially considering the value to large companies, media, and even political parties.
The other ultrastructure niches really make sense as independents. Consider games: they come and go, like hit music, and it requires a big sprawling community of developers. Not a good fit inside a single monolithic company. The same is true with communities, like Stocktwits. And obviously, niche apps.
***
So, Wilson’s shot was heard round the world, and now Tweetie is part of the new Twitter infrastructure.
This won’t mean the end of competition by players like Tweetdeck or Seesmic. These have large and dynamic communities of users. But we have to see how Twitter plays this nesw game. Will they use the same APIs as everyone else, or will they exploit their knowledge and access to the inner workings of Twitter’s technology to make their own offerings faster and more reliable, a sort of Microsoft approach? Will Twitter transform itself into a Salesforce-like platform, with hundreds of integrated offerings, but owning the CRM heart of the platform?
So, investors are steering clear of those potholes, and maybe even areas like analytics, which Twitter will want to move into, even if they haven’t done anything yet. The future is very cloudy, and the investors are looking for lower risk bets elsewhere, which doesn’t concern Twitter’s shareholders.
It does suggest that Twitter might be served by an IPO, however, since that would be the cheapest way to attract the capital it needs to build its own ecosystem of services as a competitive strategy against Facebook and other social networking giants (like Apple and Google).
- Venture capitalists tire of Twitter-y start-ups (news.cnet.com)
- Investors Squeamish About Third-Party Twitter Apps [STATS] (mashable.com)
- The New Reality of the Twitter Ecosystem (gigaom.com)

i find great irony in the fact that flipboard is featuring a post of mine on their front screen where i am mildly critical of their product
Twitter Raising The Infrastructure: App Builders Better Run For The Ultrastructure
So, Fred Wilson’s recent blog post (see Fred Wilson Plotting Twitter’s Future) turns out not to have been the ramblings of philosophical market observer: it looks more like the starter’s gun at the outset of a footrace.
He suggested that Twitter might start to fill ‘holes’ in its architecture, holes that may be occupied by other applications built by third parties. Then, the next day, they announced the roll out of a ‘official’ Twitter client for Blackberry, and today, Ev announced the acquisition of Atebits, the maker of Tweetie, the most popular iPhone client:
Ev Williams, Twitter for iPhone
Twitter has been growing by leaps and bounds around the world. Mobile has always been a focus for us—starting with SMS which lead to the 140 character limit. People everywhere should be able to access Twitter without friction or confusion. Careful analysis of the Twitter user experience in the iTunes AppStore revealed massive room for improvement. People are looking for an app from Twitter, and they’re not finding one. So, they get confused and give up. It’s important that we optimize for user benefit and create an awesome experience.
We’re thrilled to announce that we’ve entered into an agreement with Atebits (aka Loren Brichter) to acquire Tweetie, a leading iPhone Twitter client. Tweetie will be renamed Twitter for iPhone and made free (currently $2.99) in the iTunes AppStore in the coming weeks. Loren will become a key member of our mobile team that is already having huge impact with device makers and service providers around the world. Loren’s work won the 2009 Apple Design Award and we will eventually launch Twitter for iPad with his help.
Note there is no fiddle-faddle about the name: they immediately rebranded to ‘Twitter for iPhone’.
And the motivation? People are confused that there is no Twitter branded client, so Twitter has decided to do the right thing and give them one. No mention of the existing players in those niches, and all a week before the developers conference.
Here’s what is happening: Twitter is consolidating its position at the center of the ecosystem it has engendered, and as part of that functionality that is deemed necessary to the infrastructure is going to be built by them, or at least owned by them through acquisition.
The old model had a lot of holes, like search, clients, Url shortening, pictures, and geolocation. These niches had many players trying to establish themselves, creating a rich ultrastructure above the platform:

Twitter started to buy some companies to fill glaring holes (like Summize for search) and they have built some parts of other capabilities (like their own URL shortener for direct messages), but mostly the maps was still a mess.
Now, they have bought Tweetie, built a client for Blackberry, and they are moving toward a new theory of where the platform begins and ends:

Of course there is no saying that Twitter will leave the line there. They are going to have to make their roadmap clear at the upcoming Chirp developer conference, so that third parties can make reasonable investments in new applications without the fear that Twitter will step on their toes.
However, I am making a bet. I am sure that Twitter realizes the value of analytics: the treasure of information about the flow in Twitter can’t be treated as a side show, because it is the show. Therefore, I am predicting that Twitter will build or buy technology to capture all sorts of information — what links are streaming by, who’s using what hashtags, and sentiment about brands — this is enormously valuable. Acquisition of companies like Radian6, bit.ly and a few others would make sense, especially considering the value to large companies, media, and even political parties.

The other ultrastructure niches really make sense as independents. Consider games: they come and go, like hit music, and it requires a big sprawling community of developers. Not a good fit inside a single monolithic company. The same is true with communities, like Stocktwits. And obviously, niche apps.
***
So, Wilson’s shot was heard round the world, and now Tweetie is part of the new Twitter infrastructure.
This won’t mean the end of competition by players like Tweetdeck or Seesmic. These have large and dynamic communities of users. But we have to see how Twitter plays this nesw game. Will they use the same APIs as everyone else, or will they exploit their knowledge and access to the inner workings of Twitter’s technology to make their own offerings faster and more reliable, a sort of Microsoft approach? Will Twitter transform itself into a Salesforce-like platform, with hundreds of integrated offerings, but owning the CRM heart of the platform?
I am sure we will hear these questions at Chirp, and although I won’t be attending (conflict with work on my own event on 19 Apr, Social Business Edge), I will be watching the Twitter stream from the event very closely.
[disclosure: Bit.ly is a client of mine, and I have a financial interest in the company.]
Update on Saturday, April 10, 2010 at 1:01PM
This looks like the weekend’s big tech news story:
Daniel Ionescu / PC World: Twitter Gets Official iPhone, Blackberry Apps Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life: Twitter Slaps Developers in the Face and How They Can Fix It Greg Jarboe / Search Engine Watch: Newspaper Blogs Break Story of Twitter’s Acquisition of Tweetie Marshall Kirkpatrick / ReadWriteWeb: Why Twitter Buying Tweetie is Great News Stowe Boyd / /message: Twitter Raising The Infrastructure: App Builders Better Run For The Ultrastructure John C Abell / Epicenter: With Tweetie Acquisition, Twitter Locks On Mobile Zee / The Next Web: Twitter Acquires Tweetie. Launches on the iPhone. Mathew Ingram / Fortune: Twitter nabs top app maker Brad Linder / mobiputing: Twitter acquires Tweetie, introduces official iPhone Twitter app Dave Winer / Scripting News: Twitter Week for client developers Mark Evans / Twitterrati: Tweetie: The Start of Twitter’s M&A Activity? Ben Parr / Mashable!: BREAKING: Twitter Acquires Tweetie CellPassion: Twitter acquires Tweetie, to make it the official Twitter iPhone app Dan Moren / Macworld: Twitter acquires Tweetie developer Atebits Shane Richmond / blogs.telegraph.co.uk: Twitter buys Tweetie Stephen Bennett / GeekSmack: Twitter acquires Tweetie for iPhone Kiet Chieng / App Advice: Twitter Acquires Tweetie, Will Become Official Client On iPhone Jason Kincaid / TechCrunch: Twitter Acquires Tweetie GigaOm / Silicon Alley Insider: Twitter Buys Tweetie, Adds Fuel to Developer Fires Rafat Ali / paidContent: Twitter Makes First Client Acquisition: Buys Tweetie For iPhone Client; What’s Next? Alexia Tsotsis / The Snitch: Twitter, Now Filling Its Own Hole Peter Kafka / MediaMemo: Twitter Goes Shopping, Comes Home With Tweetie. Next? Mike Schramm / TUAW: Breaking: Twitter acquires Tweetie, will make it official and free Seth Weintraub / 9 to 5 Mac: Twitter buys Tweetie, iPhone app to become free Charles Hudson’s Weblog: Three Reminders about Platform Businesses (Apple, Twitter, and Facebook) Jay Hathaway / Download Squad: Twitter acquires Tweetie, hires developer Loren Brichter Rene Ritchie / TiPb: Tweetie to become official Twitter for iPhone Jim Dalrymple / The Loop: Twitter buys Tweetie Ray Basile / iPhone Savior: Twitter Buys Tweetie As Their Official iPhone App Phil Nickinson / Android Central: Twitter buys Tweetie for iPhone; which Android client would you serve up? Krishnan Subramanian / diversity.net.nz: Twitter Acquires Tweetie, What’s Next? Jesse David Hollington / iLounge: Twitter acquires Tweetie, to become official Twitter app Krishnan Subramanian / CloudAve: Twitter Acquires Tweetie, What’s Next? Scott Beale / Laughing Squid: Twitter Acquires Tweetie iPhone Client Ben Metcalfe Blog: Twitter continues on the offensive: now iPhone Federico Viticci / MacStories: Twitter Acquires Tweetie, Becomes “Twitter for iPhone” Soon Free in the App Store Daniel Kaszor / FP Posted: FP Tech Desk: Twitter aquires Tweetie, renames it Twitter for iPhone » All Related Discussion
Update on Sunday, April 11, 2010 at 9:18AM
Interesting piece by VC Mark Suster (Twitter’s Acquisition, Chirp & Managing Developer Relationships) on the Twitter Atebits acquisition and what it means.
Hotbed
[originally posted at Hotbed]
New York City’s tech scene is expanding at an astonishing rate these days, which raises the obvious question: why now? And, if New York has all the right ingredients to create a rich and deep technology culture, why didn’t it appear earlier?
My theory is that New York lacked, until recently, a critical factor: smart early stage investors.
The other parts of the puzzle were in place: great schools, brainy entrepreneurs, and abundant media and PR people. But without the manure that VCs provide, what looked to be a great greenhouse was cold, and very little would grow.
It is manure that makes greenhouses hot, that makes them hotbeds, and the critical factor is now being provided by folks like Chris Dixon, Fred Wilson, and John Borthwick. Chris Dixon recently made the case that the financial services downturn has dumped a lot of smart people out of financial sector, and also chimes in on the role that smart investors are having:
[…] why did New York City lag behind the West Coast this decade so much more than last decade? Especially since the internet in the 2000’s has been more than ever about consumers, media, and advertising – traditional New York City strengths?
I think the only explanation is that the finance bubble of 2003-2008 was a giant talent suck on the East Coast. The people I knew graduating out of top engineering or business programs on the East Cast were all trying to work at hedge funds or big banks or else felt like fish out of water and moved west. Money was flowing so freely in the finance world that there was no way the risk/reward trade off of startups could compete. Eventually it just became downright idiosyncratic to be a startup person on the East Coast. The Larry and Sergey of the East Coast were probably inventing high frequency trading algorithms at Goldman Sachs.
But this is why New York City now seems poised for a technology startup boom. The finance bubble has burst and the industry will hopefully return to its historical norm, about half its bubble size. The traditional advertising and media businesses are in disarray. The people who work in them will no doubt find new applications for their talents.
There is also a nice ecosystem developing in New York City. Union Square Ventures is one of the best VC’s in the country, with early stage investments in companies like Twitter and Etsy (that were followed on by top West Coast VCs at significant markups). Bessemer is an old firm that has a managed to stay relevant with investments in Yelp, Skype, and LinkedIn among others. There is also a new wave of scrappy Boston firms spending a lot of time in New York City – specifically Spark, General Catalyst, Flybridge, and Bain Ventures. First Round Capital out of Philadelphia is extremely active in early stage investing in New York. There are a bunch of veteran entrepreneurs actively investing in and mentoring seed stage startups. Google has a big office here and many people seem to be leaving to go start companies.
Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures, recently made the point that NYC has been slowly growing as a start-up hub for a decade:
Chris argues that for the past decade, hedge funds and wall street have been a huge talent suck here in NYC and now that they are scaling back, our kinds of companies will find it easier to attract the best and brightest. I agree completely.
But I take some offense to Chris’ view that NYC was “irrelevant” in the 2003-2008 internet boom. TACODA, Right Media, Gawker, Quigo, Delicious, Etsy, Meetup, Indeed, Tumblr, Return Path, etc, etc. I don’t call that irrelevant. I call it misunderstood. Good thing people, including our Mayor, are waking up to what a good thing we’ve got going here.
I think a tipping point has been reached, though, where all the pieces are now connecting, and we are moving past an inflection point into explosive growth.
One of the other factors, that can’t be downplayed, was the cold water that got splashed all over the San Francisco tech environment in the fall of 2008.
Sequoia’s infamous ‘Good Times: RIP’ presentation — and the thinking behind it — infected Silicon Valley’s venture world like a zombie plague. In a nutshell, the venture firm had a secret meeting of its partners and key staff after the banking sector melted down, and shared a vision of rising financial insecurity and the need to decrease risk exposure. The result was a Valley wide cut back in deals, and a push to make portfolio companies more lean through staff cuts, decreased marketing, and slower technology roll-out. Over the next 18 months many companies would lose their funding, and thousands of developers, designers, and marketing folks would lose their jobs or contracts.
While the funded entrepreneurs and investors in the Bay area were busily patting themselves on the back for being so austere and forward-looking, the migration of start-up aspirants from Montana, Ohio, and Mumbai slowed. The big freeze stopped decades of software immigrants heading for the West Coast to start the next big thing. Now it looks like New York City might be the new tech Mecca.
Ron Conway, the great angel investor, made a presentation last November at a Betaworks brown bag lunch. He stated, more or less, that his group had made 25 investments in NYC companies by that point in 2009, out of 37 investments in total. (I may have the exact numbers wrong, but not by much.) In the previous year, he made only one investment in NYC, and in all the previous years he had been an investor, none.
Yes, this is a single investor, and it could represent a new-found willingness to invest outside of California on his part. Still, I find it indicative of the piling-on effect of smart money chasing other smart money in an environment that is creating enough innovation to justify it.
So, this new project, called Hotbed, is a vehicle for me to examine what is going into this creative frenzy, this exploding scene. I am an economic migrant, myself. In late 2009 I left San Francisco, a city I had used as my base of operations for 4 years, and I am now rerooting myself in New York City. This will be the journal of my inquiry into the peculiar chemistry of New York’s start-up explosion. I will continue to write about more global topics at /Message, as I have been doing since 2005. But Hotbed is all about New York tech start-ups, and the shifting, swirling scene that supports them.
Fred Wilson Still Loves Jet Blue, But ..
He’s not happy:
[from A VC: I Still Love Jet Blue, But ..]
Jet Blue has gotten too big for its britches.
Still way better than my recent go around with Virgin Atlantic. Of, by the way, here’s the email I got after complaining about my recent trip:
[via email]
“Customer.Relations.US@fly.virgin.com”
Thanks for writing to us.
This message has been sent automatically to let you know that we have
yours, so please don’t reply to this address. Your comments are really
important to us and we’ll write back as soon as we can, within the next
21days.Please feel free to take a look at our website as it tells you everything
you need to know about the customer relations and baggage claims service.
The address is
http://www.virgin-atlantic.com/en/us/customerrelations/index.jsp.Kind regards
Virgin Atlantic Customer Relations
It’s so important they are going to respond in the next 21 days! And it’s not even signed by a human being!
