prostheticknowledge:

“Facebook Is The New Suburbia” by Hugh MacLeod (aka GapingVoid)

From May 2009 — I wrote about the need to take back the social space on the web, because the massive companies operating there/here want to own it, and by extension, own our interactions. It elicited nearly no interest at the time, but I think this is a case of being too far ahead of the curve. It might be time for a New Spatialism movement. We need to (re)occupy the web:

New Spatialism:  Reclaiming Social Space In Web Media via stoweboyd.com
Using an analogy from city planning and architecture, we need a  rethinking of the basics: something like the New Urbanism movement, that  tried to reclaim shared urban space in a way that matches human needs,  and moved away from gigantic and dehumanizing cityscapes of the mid and  late twentieth century, where garbage trucks seemed more at home than a  teenage girl walking a dog.
So, we need a New Spatialism movement, to rethink web media and  reclaim the social space that is supposed to be central to so-called  social media. Some web media may just remain what it is, like an  industrial district at the edge of town. But at least some parts of web  media should be reconceptualized, and reconstructed to get back to human  scale. Just as New Urbanism is about organizing streets, sidewalks, and  plazas to support the growth of social capital, New Spatialism would  help us channel interactions on line to increase sociality, and thereby  increase the growth of social capital.
New Spatialism is based on the idea that our primary motivations for  being online are extra-market drivers: we are not online for money,  principally. We have created the web to happen to ourselves: to shape a  new culture and build a better, more resilient world. And we need better  media tools than we have at present, to make that a reality.

In another piece:

We are confronted with a period of social media sprawl, where large  media corporations are buying up all the intersections and off ramp  properties out at the periphery of town where the highway goes by.

prostheticknowledge:

“Facebook Is The New Suburbia” by Hugh MacLeod (aka GapingVoid)

From May 2009 — I wrote about the need to take back the social space on the web, because the massive companies operating there/here want to own it, and by extension, own our interactions. It elicited nearly no interest at the time, but I think this is a case of being too far ahead of the curve. It might be time for a New Spatialism movement. We need to (re)occupy the web:

New Spatialism:  Reclaiming Social Space In Web Media via stoweboyd.com

Using an analogy from city planning and architecture, we need a rethinking of the basics: something like the New Urbanism movement, that tried to reclaim shared urban space in a way that matches human needs, and moved away from gigantic and dehumanizing cityscapes of the mid and late twentieth century, where garbage trucks seemed more at home than a teenage girl walking a dog.

So, we need a New Spatialism movement, to rethink web media and reclaim the social space that is supposed to be central to so-called social media. Some web media may just remain what it is, like an industrial district at the edge of town. But at least some parts of web media should be reconceptualized, and reconstructed to get back to human scale. Just as New Urbanism is about organizing streets, sidewalks, and plazas to support the growth of social capital, New Spatialism would help us channel interactions on line to increase sociality, and thereby increase the growth of social capital.

New Spatialism is based on the idea that our primary motivations for being online are extra-market drivers: we are not online for money, principally. We have created the web to happen to ourselves: to shape a new culture and build a better, more resilient world. And we need better media tools than we have at present, to make that a reality.

In another piece:

We are confronted with a period of social media sprawl, where large media corporations are buying up all the intersections and off ramp properties out at the periphery of town where the highway goes by.

Rebooting

The Reboot conference in Copenhagen last week was a redefining experience for me. Even at the superficial level, the conference was hypnotically involving: the city is beautiful, the citizens helpful and attractive, and the conference setting was great. At a somewhat deeper level, the conference attendees and presentations were top-notch, as I detailed in that earlier post. But, although in general I think myself to be immune from such legerdemain, the premise that we, the attendees, had all come to Reboot to reboot ourselves, to gain some new sense of direction and purpose… well, it actually worked on me.

The theme of the conference was renaissance, both personal and cultural. So, I spent some of the time in Copenhagen, out in the variable sunshine at the Kettelhalle, the conference venue, reflecting on both aspects of the theme. And I have arrived at a small epiphany of sorts, regarding what it is that I am up to.

I had confirmation of my greater goals, when Hugh MacLeod was writing up some of his thoughts on the conference. Along with discussion of his time at the conference, he mentions that he had the chance to spend some time with me, and he writes “The guy wants to change the world!”

Well, I do. I confess.

In particular, I am rededicating myself to the advancement of Web culture and taking what we are learning there about the future of human interaction, and seeking to find ways to inject that into the greater world culture. This is the largest and greatest application of the principle behind /Message: the edge changing the center.

And we, those of us out here at the edge of Web culture, have a moral and social obligation to make sure that the opponents of that future don’t derail it, don’t sidetrack it, and don’t subvert it. This reaches into all sectors of life: economics, business, politics, education, religion, art, and all the other slices of human experience. A battle on all fronts, at all points.

Our first duty is to explore the dynamics of the Web to gain a better understanding of what it might all mean, and to help others do so, too. That reaches into my everyday job of looking at new technologies, new companies, and new approaches to innovation, trying to see where it all is headed, on a microcosmic and macrocosmic level. But I believe that I need to touch upon the big picture issues more than I have been in the past, especially examining the core principles of Web culture, and the tactics of its enemies.

As one aspect of this personal renaissance, I am hoping to spend more time outside the United States. I need to be in direct contact with more members of this global cultural phenomenon. I have recently spent some time in Canada, and although Americans may discount the foreignness of our close neighbor to the north, and while some of the differences are subtle, don’t be fooled: it is a profoundly different place. And of course, I just spent a week in Europe, in Hamburg and Copenhagen, and that was really mind-expanding.

At the close of the conference, Thomas Madsen-Mygdal was leading the conference in a closing exercise, asking us what we would be doing differently in the next year because of Reboot. As he walked the floor, the answers were all over the place: “To spend more time with my son”, “Learn Rails”, “Start the company I have been thinking about for years”, and so on. When my time came, I blurted, “To spend more time in Europe.” Yes, I am hoping to do that, as well as to make a trip to Asia, to find out what is happening there.

But perhaps more than the specifics, I reflected on the flight home and considered personal renaissance. Perhaps “renaissance” is a bit strong, since it suggests the entire European continent moving out of the Dark Ages. But, at the least, Reboot has tricked me into looking back at the thoughts that led me, so many years ago, to start type, type, typing about social technologies and their impacts on us, individually and collectively.

I left Reboot with a handful of email addresses, a half dozen blurry images from restaurants and train stations, and a few dozen new friends. And something more, something that has lodged beneath the skin, deeper than a glance at the program or even a thorough reading of the wiki would ever reveal.

So, I will stay at the edge, doing much the same things day-to-day: talking with start-ups, reviewing new tools, and thinking about their impact on how we do what we do. But, more and more, you will hear me talking about how this all means we can do new things, and that old ways and means can be put aside: that we can make changes for the better, and entice the world along with us, to where this is all headed.

Gandhi said “You have to be the change you want in the world,” and Reboot has brought me back to that simple defining insight. The secret to purpose in life (or happiness, or enlightenment, or meaning) is that there is no secret: its right here, in front of you, right now. And Reboot, for me at least, was in fact that kind of shining mirror, where I relearned that the key to finding my way in the world is to find myself, to rediscover what drives me to get up every morning and attack the empty white page, and to knit these observations into the skein of others’ thoughts, needs, and aspirations. By working on the small, I am made large. By focusing on here and now, I am working toward what lies beyond.

Don’t be concerned. I have not put aside the old Stowe for some prating, namby-pamby, new age fruitcake. It’s still the same old familiar raving lunatic, following the same ideas, the way I have for years, and especially since January, when I left the past behind and started this new blog. Still, at the same time, it’s great to clean out the carburetor, and to remember that it’s supposed to add up to more than a paycheck and a Technorati rank.

Expect things will be a bit different, even though my style won’t change much. So: new themes, new rants, but mostly the same old, same old.

I haven’t been converted to some new world view, after all: it’s only a Reboot!

Blogging for Fame….and Maybe Fortune

A relatively lopsided discussion between Jason Calacanis and Alan Meckler at WSJ.com, Can Bloggers Make Money?, where Jason overpowers with hard data about CPM rates and Alan restates the conventional wisdom.

The truth is that blogging is an egalitarian and edge medium: anyone can start a blog. Some years ago William S Burroughs (in Words Of Advice For Young People) said “Any old soul is worth saving, at least to a priest; but not every soul is worth buying. So, you can take the offer as a compliment.” So, while all can blog, not all can make money from it.

Glenn Fleishman makes some good comments at the WSJ.com piece, noting that he has received paychecks from both Meckler and Calacanis:

[from comments]

I’ve been asked many times over the last three years about how to run a blog that makes money as my Wi-Fi Networking News one does. It requires a combination of obsession, reporting skills and/or a good turn of phrase, an audience willing to read obsessively, enough of an audience in a segment, and advertising dollars that target that audience.

David Sifry of Technorati put it well in an analysis a few weeks ago (http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000420.html) in which he identifed 155,000 sites that are close enough to the top of the power log curve of inbound links that they get significant traffic (not nearly as much as the real top hitting blogs and news sites). Tens of millions of blogs get only personal traffic.

Even though I enjoy what I do, it’s the equivalent of a very small business. I don’t make enough to hire other writers, although that’s a plan. But I don’t have to invest very much except my time. If I were to burn out, which has happened to some other fine bloggers, then there’s the question of monetizing a blog to sell it or to replace the main writer or writers.

My bet is that the top 20,000 blogs or so (today) can make serious bank, enough to be, as Fleishman puts it, a “significant minority” of the author’s income. These bloggers will become enmeshed in blog networks or ad networks that free them to write obsessively, focusing on the flow of words, not the clickstream.

A number of others (like Thomas Hawk and Hugh MacLeod) jump in to point out that for many of us, blogging is a way to flog our personal brands (Hugh says “microbrands”) or position ourselves as experts to get consulting gigs, or sell books.

But today’s news about the New York Times investors witholding votes because of the plummeting value of that company’s stock (fallen 47% since the start of 2004) tells the other side of the blogging for dollars story: media is surging onto the Web, and readers are gobbling up the top information sources online. And blogs (and their wild-eyed authors) are going to remain a fixture in this world. And the very best are going to be well-compensated for it, once all the kinks in the supply chain are worked out.

Hugh Macleod on When God Asked Me To Take Over

Inspired by Dave Winer’s impending blog suicide:

[from gapingvoid: when god]

I remember when God asked me to take over for Him. As I was inventing RSS at the time, I sadly had to turn him down. But imagine how much better the Universe would have been.

As I said yesterday, Dave needs to lighten up, get a life, get laid, find a hobby, whatever. Maybe he does need to stop blogging for a while. I took 9 days off last fall and rethought everything in my work life, leading to firing myself from Corante.

But I am amazed that this continues to be top-of-mind news, especially because he hasn’t stopped blogging, he only said that maybe he would, maybe at the end of the year. We might all be dead of avian flu by then, or living in a dictatorship, or counting the dead from a nuclear war in West Asia. Let’s get on with it people.

According To Hugh, I Am Sunk

Hugh Macleod posts ten reasons why nobody reads your blog, and stabs me right in the heart:

[gapingvoid: top ten reasons why nobody reads your blog]8. The very fact that you’re whining about traffic makes people not want to read your blog.

Instead it makes them want to emulate the champagne-swigging A-Listers currently mocking you.

9. You’ve only been writing the damn thing for a week.

And you’re already whinging. See Point Number Eight.

I hope I get special dispensation since I have actually been writing a blog since 2000.